Circumstitions NEWS: AAP policy unethical, dishonest

There is no better or more concise take down of the AAP’s new (but not new) policy on circumcision of unconsenting male children. Or if there is, I haven’t seen it. Check it out.

“Bottom line: the AAP does not recommend [routine] circumcision. It is still true that no national medical association in the world does.”

About David Wilton

fronterizo, defense lawyer, intactivist
This entry was posted in Medicine and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Circumstitions NEWS: AAP policy unethical, dishonest

  1. They brand men like a herd of cows. “Neonatal post-traumatic stress disorder” — the recurrent American nightmare for boys. If it were women tied down & cut, the Feminists would be howling all over the world. The male genitals are a cheap commodity. There is no argument too absurd for the circumcisers. They insult the appearance of the intact penis, claim that circumcision heals everything from body warts to HIV, and draw an illogical distinction between female & male genitals. Circumcision is the mark of a slave, not a free man. It will be up to merciful mothers to spare their sons this humiliation. With a few exceptions, most circumcised men are too defensive to own up to their loss. Please see “The Circumcision of Benjamin” at http://tinyurl.com/bmh2p2m
    Join the Men of Facebook who stand against circumcision: http://tinyurl.com/9ur8udg ~Brother K~

Comments are closed.