ZIMBABWE: A familiar fear – one intervention at a time, likely the norm in HIV prevention

Many critics of the African circumcision trials drew the obvious conclusion that a push for male circumcision in Africa and elsewhere would result in a corresponding drop in condom use. In a partially useful risk reduction intervention, such a result would necessarily negate any gains. Now we have proof from another intervention, the female condom.

Researchers did a follow up on a trial that sought to increase the use of both condoms and female diaphragms. They found that after the trial ended, the use of the dual technique dropped to pre-intervention levels. They concluded, and further commented on an upcoming intervention, “The results showed us that it is a challenge to use concurrent HIV prevention methods … . If tenofovir gel becomes available, women may ask – if we have the microbicide, why use a condom?”

Does that last line sound familiar? It should.

Link: ZIMBABWE: Drop in Condom Use Following HIV Prevention Trial

About David Wilton

fronterizo, defense lawyer
This entry was posted in Africa and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s