Royal Dutch Medical Association issues statement on male circumcision of infants and children, AAP now has model statement to draw on

knmg logo The Royal Dutch Medical Association* has come out with its first ever male circumcision policy statement regarding infants and children (very thoughtfully provided in English as well as in Dutch). According to the preamble, the reasons for this are the following.

The reason for our adoption of an official viewpoint regarding this matter is the increasing emphasis on children’s rights. It is particularly relevant for doctors that children must not be subjected to medical proceedings that have no therapeutic or preventative value. In addition to this, there is growing concern regarding complications, both minor and serious, which can occur as a result of circumcising a child. A third reason for this viewpoint is the growing sentiment that there is a discrepancy between the KNMG’s firm stance with regard to female genital mutilation and the lack of a stance with regard to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, as the two have a number of similarities.

The statement starts with a very useful summary of the longer discussion that follows. This summary is provided in bullet points and is reproduced below.

  • There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene. Partly in the light of the complications which can arise during or after circumcision, circumcision is not justifiable except on medical/therapeutic grounds. Insofar as there are medical benefits, such as a possibly reduced risk of HIV infection, it is reasonable to put off circumcision until the age at which such a risk is relevant and the boy himself can decide about the intervention, or can opt for any available alternatives.
  • Contrary to what is often thought, circumcision entails the risk of medical and psychological complications. The most common complications are bleeding, infections, meatus stenosis (narrowing of the urethra) and panic attacks. Partial or complete penis amputations as a result of complications following circumcisions have also been reported, as have psychological problems as a result of the circumcision.
  • Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors is contrary to the rule that minors may only be exposed to medical treatments if illness or abnormalities are present, or if it can be convincingly demonstrated that the medical intervention is in the interest of the child, as in the case of vaccinations.
  • Non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors conflicts with the child’s right to autonomy and physical integrity.
  • The KNMG calls on (referring) doctors to explicitly inform parents/carers who are considering non-therapeutic circumcision for male minors of the risk of complications and the lack of convincing medical benefits. The fact that this is a medically non-essential intervention with a real risk of complications makes the quality of this advice particularly important. The doctor must then record the informed consent in the medical file.
  • The KNMG respects the deep religious, symbolic and cultural feelings that surround the practice of nontherapeutic circumcision. The KNMG calls for a dialogue between doctors’ organisations, experts and the religious groups concerned in order to put the issue of non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors on the agenda and ultimately restrict it as much as possible.
  • There are good reasons for a legal prohibition of non-therapeutic circumcision of male minors, as exists for female genital mutilation. However, the KNMG fears that a legal prohibition would result in the intervention being performed by non medically qualified individuals in circumstances in which the quality of the intervention could not be sufficiently guaranteed. This could lead to more serious complications than is currently the case.

The AAP now has a model statement it can refer to and draw from for its upcoming revision of its own male circumcision policy position. I hope they turn away from the forces that are lobbying for issuance of an approving statement or one like we just had on female circumcision that urges relaxed standards, and moves towards this kind of statement on the male counterpart to FGM.

Download KNMG Viewpoint – Circumcision – Netherlands

*Also known by the Dutch acronym KNMG which stands for De Koninklijke
Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot bevordering der Geneeskunst.

About David Wilton

fronterizo, defense lawyer, intactivist
This entry was posted in Medicine and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Royal Dutch Medical Association issues statement on male circumcision of infants and children, AAP now has model statement to draw on

  1. Excellent and thoughtful statement from the Netherlands (not surprising, as European nations tend to be a bit more progressive in the social arena).
    Now if only the AAP would look at what the rest of the world is saying instead of digging in their heels… but to follow suit would be to admit that the last 140 years of American scientific opinion on male circumcision has been little more than medical fraud.
    We can hope, though!

Comments are closed.